MSI 08/2026 · Market Sustainability Intelligence

Supply ChainResilience &Regionalisation

How can businesses build resilient supply networks while balancing global reach and regional strength?

Survey Base
25 respondents · 13 questions
Edition
August 2026
84%
Disruption exposure
report moderate or high exposure
68%
Balanced sourcing
prefer global and regional suppliers
72%
Regional hub outlook
expect significant UAE & Middle East strengthening
§ 01

Executive introduction

Global reach, regional depth and the capacity to reconfigure.

Supply chains are being redesigned around concentration, optionality and the consequences of failure. Regionalisation creates value where shorter lead times, continuity and strategic importance justify investment, while global sourcing remains essential for specialist capabilities and scale.

This edition connects the geography of sourcing with resilience economics, digital visibility and Scope 3. A resilient network understands its critical dependencies, has genuinely independent alternatives and can change supplier, route, inventory or production location when conditions change.

For the UAE, GCC and wider Middle East, the opportunity extends beyond cargo volumes: it lies in connecting logistics infrastructure, industrial capabilities, qualified suppliers, digital systems and strong partnerships.

§ 02

Boardroom & expert views

Five contributors connect sourcing, operational resilience, digital intelligence and sustainability.

Dina Mongy

Dina Mongy

Head of Corporate Affairs and Sustainability · Nestlé · UAE, Kuwait, Qatar and Yemen
Optionality / Partnerships / Preparedness
“Resilience is ultimately about optionality: understanding where critical dependencies are, building alternatives early, and creating the relationships that allow us to act when it matters.”

Connect external intelligence with business decisions and build trusted alternatives before disruption occurs.

Melvis Furtado

Melvis Furtado

Supply Chain & Procurement Strategist · AI & Digital Transformation Leader · Regional Business Head, Trellissoft
Regionalisation / Digital Intelligence / Sourcing
“Global where it makes sense, regional where it matters.”

Segment sourcing decisions by criticality and combine supplier, risk and emissions information in one decision framework.

Mahesh S. Multani

Mahesh S. Multani

CEO · msm excellence
Resilience Economics / Operational Excellence
“The central question is not, ‘How much redundancy can we afford?’ It is, ‘Which targeted capabilities provide the highest value under plausible disruption scenarios?’”

Remove low-value complexity and evaluate resilience investment through continuity, recovery time and economic value protected.

Cristina Ortega Beng

Cristina Ortega Beng

Sustainability Manager
Scope 3 / Sourcing / Transformation
“Scope 3 should be treated as a transformation agenda, not merely a disclosure obligation.”

Integrate supplier emissions information into sourcing, network design and commercial decisions.

Kaunain Shahidi

Kaunain Shahidi

Procurement, Strategy & Innovation Professional · Supply Chain & Circular Economy Advocate
Logistics Options / Standardisation / Regional Capability
“Localize what is strategically critical. Regionalize where resilience creates real value.”

Prequalify alternative suppliers, routes and materials, and use standardisation to improve switching flexibility.

§ 03

Market survey findings

Original MEBAS research on sourcing, digital capability and regional opportunity.

Sourcing preference

Balanced global / regional68%
Strong localisation20%
Primarily global12%

Supplier strategy

Actively diversifying suppliers56%
Building regional supplier networks32%
Maintaining existing structure12%

Technology and visibility

Technology critical or very important92%
High supply-chain visibility16%

Separate questions; the comparison does not establish causality.

Scope 3 integration

Fully integrated16%
In progress44%
Early stage32%
Not addressed8%

Investment priorities

Technology and digital tools80%
Supplier diversification48%
Sustainability32%
Regional infrastructure28%
Inventory / storage12%

Multiple selections permitted.

Regional hub outlook

Significant strengthening72%
Moderate strengthening28%

Source: MEBAS Supply Chain Resilience & Regionalisation Survey, August 2026 · n=25 · 13 questions. Findings are directional and should not be generalised to all GCC companies. The sample composition, recruitment method and response rate were not supplied.

§ 04

Key takeaways for business leaders

From awareness to operational readiness.

01Map critical dependencies. Identify shared upstream materials, factories, energy systems and transport chokepoints.
02Build selective regional alternatives. Focus investment where continuity, speed or strategic importance justifies the cost.
03Evaluate resilience-adjusted total cost. Assess disruption losses, carbon, recovery time and the value of operational options alongside purchase price.
04Turn visibility into decisions. Connect supplier, inventory, logistics and external-risk information to enable faster responses.
05Integrate sustainability and collaboration. Use shared supplier intelligence and build partnerships before disruption occurs.
§ 05 · Boardroom and Expert Questions

Questions for Boardroom and Experts

Questions explored in the August 2026 report on supply-chain resilience, regionalisation, digital visibility and sustainability.

Q01How should supply chain strategies evolve to address increasing trade disruption and geopolitical uncertainty?
Q02What are the most effective approaches to balancing global efficiency with regionalisation and localisation?
Q03How can organisations improve supply chain visibility and manage Scope 3 risks more effectively?
Q04How should companies prioritise sustainability and Scope 3 within supply chain transformation?
B01How should leadership rethink supply chain strategies to remain resilient and competitive?
MSI August 2026 · Preview edition

Request the full report

Request access to the complete August Market Sustainability Intelligence report for detailed contributor responses and survey findings.